I think, therefore IB

When someone proudly announces that they speak three, four, or even six languages, it can sound impressive. There’s discipline, commitment, and plenty of practice behind that achievement. But every so often, I find myself wondering: what if all that effort went into the mechanics of language learning, without much substance to fill the conversations? It’s like listening to a virtuoso pianist who only plays scales—technically dazzling, but not especially engaging.

This thought has broader relevance to what we do as IB educators. We know that knowledge acquisition matters. Students must learn the structures, the frameworks, the technical skills of our disciplines. But if their entire focus rests on collecting skills—whether it’s mastering a language, memorizing formulas, or perfecting essay templates—they may miss the deeper purpose: using those tools to explore ideas, make meaning, and engage with the world.

The International Baccalaureate reminds us of this balance constantly. The Learner Profile emphasizes not just being knowledgeable, but also being thinkers, communicators, and principled. A student who can flawlessly recite definitions but never apply them to a real-world situation is just as limited as a polyglot who can switch between six languages but has nothing to say in any of them. The point is not how much knowledge is acquired, but how it is used to generate understanding and insight.

As teachers, we see this tension daily. A mathematics student might become obsessed with solving increasingly complex problems but struggle to explain why the method matters. A language student might focus on vocabulary drills but never engage with the cultural ideas behind the texts. A history student might learn every date and treaty but fail to reflect on how those events shaped today’s world. These are all variations of the same challenge: skill without substance.

So how do we, as IB teachers, help students move beyond scales to symphonies? One approach is to design learning that requires transfer. Instead of just drilling formulas, we ask students to use them to model a real-life scenario. Instead of focusing solely on vocabulary, we ask them to discuss a contemporary issue in the target language. Instead of memorizing dates, we ask them to evaluate perspectives on a historical event and connect it to present-day conflicts. Depth grows when students are pushed to apply their skills to problems that demand reflection, judgment, and creativity.

This also has implications for how we model learning ourselves. If we celebrate multilingualism, it shouldn’t be just for the number of languages learned, but for the opportunities it gives us to encounter new cultures, challenge assumptions, and hold richer conversations. If we celebrate a student’s mastery of equations, it should be because they can use those equations to make sense of a phenomenon that matters. The aim is always to shift the focus from “look what I can do” to “look what I can think about, question, and contribute because of what I can do.”

Perhaps that’s the deeper reminder here: in education, as in life, substance matters more than surface. It’s not about how many languages you know, but whether you use them to say something meaningful. Not about how many formulas you can recite, but whether you can use them to illuminate a problem. Not about how many facts you remember, but whether you can weave them into a story that makes sense of the world.

In the end, our role as IB teachers is to keep pushing students beyond the mechanics of learning into the messy, complex, and rewarding realm of meaning-making. Because while scales and drills may build skill, it is the music—and the conversation—that truly lasts.

---